
This flowchart illustrates the peer review process in this journal, highlighting the steps from manuscript submission to publication. The peer review process at this journal is carried out in an anonymous manner, using a double-blind method.
Below is a detailed explanation of each step:
The process begins when the author submits their manuscript to the journal for consideration.
The technical editor conducts an initial review to ensure the manuscript meets basic submission requirements, such as:
Decision Point: Is the manuscript acceptable?
The manuscript is forwarded to the editor for further evaluation regarding its suitability for peer review.
Decision Point: Is the manuscript acceptable?
Reviewers are suggested based on their expertise and relevance to the manuscript’s subject matter.
The manuscript is sent to the selected peer reviewers for a detailed assessment.
The reviewers provide feedback, which may include:
Based on the feedback from the reviewers, the manuscript is returned to the author for revisions. The author is expected to address specific comments and make necessary changes.
The author submits the revised manuscript, incorporating the reviewers’ suggestions and comments.
After reviewing the revised manuscript, the editor makes a final decision:
Once the manuscript is accepted, it moves into the publication phase, which includes final formatting, copyediting, and preparation for release.